Neirani: Difference between revisions

From The Toaq Wiki
(add Toaq name, better mnemonics)
(Note on past-Neirani using {{t|p}} for {{t|ao}})
 
(4 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
[[Category:Proposals]]
[[Category:Proposals]]
[[Category:Writing systems]]
[[Category:Writing systems]]
 
[[File:Neirani sample.png|thumb|The words '{{T|koıtıeq}}', '{{T|saıram}}', '{{T|loefeı}}', and '{{T|dıaobıao}}' written with Neirani diphthongs.]]
When writing [[Derani]], we could get rid of the [[diphthong]] mark ({{Derani|◌󱛎◌}}), and instead reuse more consonant glyphs to write falling diphthongs. This makes the writing system more compact and reduces the amount of marks underneath vowels.
'''Neirani''' (formerly known as the '''Derani diphthong reform''') is a variant of the [[Derani]] script in which falling diphthongs are written as single letters, rather than using the diphthong mark ({{Derani|◌󱛎◌}}). This makes the writing system more compact and light on diacritics.
 
The Toaq name for this reform is {{dr|Neıranı}}, after the total of nine vowel glyphs.


{| class="wikitable"
{| class="wikitable"
! Official
! Official
! Reform
!Neirani
! Mnemonic
|-
|-
| {{derani|󱚺󱛎󱚹|aı}}
|{{derani|󱚺󱛎󱚹|aı}}
| {{derani|󱚶|aı/d}}
|{{derani|󱚶|aı/d}}
| Broken {{d|a}} with a tiny {{d|i}} top
|-
|{{derani|󱛃󱛎󱚹|}}
|{{derani|󱚽|oı/nh}}
|-  
|-  
| {{derani|󱚺󱛎󱛃|ao}}
|{{derani|󱚺󱛎󱛃|ao}}
| {{derani|󱚳|ao/p}}
|
| {{derani|󱚺|a}} with a tail
{{derani|󱚷|ao/t}}<ref group="note">A previous version of Neirani used {{derani|󱚳|p}} for {{T|ao}} rather than {{derani|󱚷|t}}.</ref>
|-
|-
| {{derani|󱚴󱛎󱚹|eı}}
|{{derani|󱚴󱛎󱚹|eı}}
| {{derani|󱚸|eı/z}}
|{{derani|󱚸|eı/z}}
| {{derani|󱚴|e}} with a big {{derani|󱚹|ı}} flourish
|-
| {{derani|󱛃󱛎󱚹|oı}}
| {{derani|󱚽|oı/nh}}
|
|}
|}
<references group="note" />
As with the vowel letters {{Derani|󱚺}}, {{Derani|󱚲}}, {{Derani|󱚹}}, {{Derani|󱛃}}, {{Derani|󱚴}}, these letters may stand for either a consonant or a diphthong depending on their position within a word.
[[File:Neirani origins.png|thumb|231x231px|The origins of Neirani]]
It's imagined that the letters {{derani|󱚶|}}, {{derani|󱚷|}}, {{derani|󱚸|}}, and {{derani|󱚽|}} were originally formed by joining the vowel letters of each diphthong into more complex shapes that could still be written in a single stroke. {{Derani|󱚲|u}} came to be used for the 'o' in 'ao' and 'oı' because of its simpler shape. {{derani|󱚷|ao}} was assigned a wider glyph than the other diphthongs because Toaq [[phonology]] allows it to be pronounced as two syllables when stressed ([aː.o]).
Hoemaı called this "probably not a bad idea" so maybe we should start using it!<ref>https://discord.com/channels/311223912044167168/311223912044167168/1206242114380242974</ref>


Hoemaı called this "probably not a bad idea" so maybe we should start using it! <ref>https://discord.com/channels/311223912044167168/311223912044167168/1206242114380242974</ref>
<references />

Latest revision as of 03:35, 24 August 2025

The words 'koıtıeq', 'saıram', 'loefeı', and 'dıaobıao' written with Neirani diphthongs.

Neirani (formerly known as the Derani diphthong reform) is a variant of the Derani script in which falling diphthongs are written as single letters, rather than using the diphthong mark (◌󱛎◌). This makes the writing system more compact and light on diacritics.

Official Neirani
󱚺󱛎󱚹 () 󱚶 (aı/d)
󱛃󱛎󱚹 () 󱚽 (oı/nh)
󱚺󱛎󱛃 (ao)

󱚷 (ao/t)[note 1]

󱚴󱛎󱚹 () 󱚸 (eı/z)
  1. A previous version of Neirani used 󱚳 (p) for ao rather than 󱚷 (t).

As with the vowel letters 󱚺, 󱚲, 󱚹, 󱛃, 󱚴, these letters may stand for either a consonant or a diphthong depending on their position within a word.

The origins of Neirani

It's imagined that the letters 󱚶, 󱚷, 󱚸, and 󱚽 were originally formed by joining the vowel letters of each diphthong into more complex shapes that could still be written in a single stroke. 󱚲 (u) came to be used for the 'o' in 'ao' and 'oı' because of its simpler shape. 󱚷 (ao) was assigned a wider glyph than the other diphthongs because Toaq phonology allows it to be pronounced as two syllables when stressed ([aː.o]).

Hoemaı called this "probably not a bad idea" so maybe we should start using it![1]