No Scope Creep: Difference between revisions

Use {{proposal}} template
 
(One intermediate revision by one other user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
'''No Scope Creep''' is a proposal to remove the [[Scope#Scope creep|scope creep]] effect from the language.
'''No Scope Creep''' is a {{proposal}} to remove the [[Scope#Scope creep|scope creep]] effect from the language.


<code>THE PROPOSAL:</code> Just remove it.
<code>THE PROPOSAL:</code> Just remove it.
Line 40: Line 40:
!Narrow scope
!Narrow scope
|-
|-
|'''{{Deranize|bu}}'''
|{{Deranize|bu}}
|{{T|Bu tı tú poq}}
|{{T|Bu tı tú poq}}
|???
|???
Line 58: Line 58:
!Narrow scope
!Narrow scope
|-
|-
|'''{{Deranize|bu}}'''
|{{Deranize|bu}}
|{{T|Tú poq nä bu tı hóa}}
|{{T|Tú poq nä bu tı hóa}}
|{{T|Bu tı tú poq}}
|{{T|Bu tı tú poq}}
Line 74: Line 74:
== Why not ==
== Why not ==
[https://discord.com/channels/311223912044167168/334810940392341514/945302821178310736 uakci says:]<blockquote>i think, in fact, that serials being "unitary" verbs that don't radiate semantics outwards across the whole sentence is a huge advantage</blockquote>Maybe it is an advantage? But consider that even non-serial verbs can already radiate side effects: some can be undefined on certain inputs, some can create questions, and some (individual-level predicates) might even take scope. With that in mind, it's not a stretch to imagine that serials could take scope, too.
[https://discord.com/channels/311223912044167168/334810940392341514/945302821178310736 uakci says:]<blockquote>i think, in fact, that serials being "unitary" verbs that don't radiate semantics outwards across the whole sentence is a huge advantage</blockquote>Maybe it is an advantage? But consider that even non-serial verbs can already radiate side effects: some can be undefined on certain inputs, some can create questions, and some (individual-level predicates) might even take scope. With that in mind, it's not a stretch to imagine that serials could take scope, too.
[[Category:Proposals]]