Animacy: Difference between revisions
(Created page with "Toaq has a system of grammatical '''animacy'''. Any noun phrase belongs to one of nine '''classes''', each with its own word for “he/she/they/it” that refers back to the...") |
No edit summary |
||
Line 44: | Line 44: | ||
* If the verb is {{t|raı}}, it's in '''class 0''' (the class containing only {{t|raı}}). | * If the verb is {{t|raı}}, it's in '''class 0''' (the class containing only {{t|raı}}). | ||
* If the verb necessarily implies animacy of its subject, it's in '''class I''' ({{t|hó}}). | * If the verb necessarily implies animacy of its subject, it's in '''class I''' ({{t|hó}}). | ||
** Examples: {{t|poq, naq, kato, che, be, deo, mıe…}} | |||
* If the verb describes some other tangible object, it's in '''class II''' ({{t|máq}}). | * If the verb describes some other tangible object, it's in '''class II''' ({{t|máq}}). | ||
** Examples: {{t|cea, kıoq, haq, toq, nao, hoe…}} | |||
* If the verb describe an abstract concept or idea, it's in '''class III''' ({{t|hóq}}). | * If the verb describe an abstract concept or idea, it's in '''class III''' ({{t|hóq}}). | ||
** Examples: {{t|noı, daq, dao, sıo, muı, zu…}} | |||
* Other verbs are '''class 4'' ({{t|tá}}). | * Other verbs are '''class 4'' ({{t|tá}}). | ||
** Examples: {{t|doq, nuı, juı, lıo, muo, raq, daı, de…}} | |||
(TODO: what is the animacy class of verbs that imply action or thought of the subject? I think they're class I also, but I'm not sure. {{t|koı, moı, tao, fıeq, jaı…}}?) | (TODO: what is the animacy class of verbs that imply action or thought of the subject? I think they're class I also, but I'm not sure. {{t|koı, moı, tao, fıeq, jaı…}}?) |
Revision as of 15:34, 6 February 2022
Toaq has a system of grammatical animacy.
Any noun phrase belongs to one of nine classes, each with its own word for “he/she/they/it” that refers back to the most recent noun phrase belonging to that class. (This system of anaphoric pronouns is the only place in Toaq where this animacy distinction comes up, so the classes are known varyingly as animacy classes, anaphora classes, or pronominal classes.)
Grammatical, rather than natural animacy
Toaq's animacy being "grammatical" means that it is a property of expressions, not of their referents.
If you know some Spanish, it's like "grammatical gender" in that language. La persona is feminine, even if the person you're talking about isn't necessarily female.
Toaq's pronouns work the same way: if you describe a person as sa sảo, the appropriate pronoun to refer to them later in the sentence is tá, because sảo is an adjective. It's not correct to use hó, because that's the pronoun for animate verbs, not animate referents.
Table of classes
Note the following distinction:
- Classes V through IX apply when the expression has a certain grammatical form.
- Classes 0 through IV apply depending on the verb animacy class of the animacy head of a determiner phrase.
Verb animacy classes
Every Toaq verb belongs to some verb animacy class:
- If the verb is raı, it's in class 0 (the class containing only raı).
- If the verb necessarily implies animacy of its subject, it's in class I (hó).
- Examples: poq, naq, kato, che, be, deo, mıe…
- If the verb describes some other tangible object, it's in class II (máq).
- Examples: cea, kıoq, haq, toq, nao, hoe…
- If the verb describe an abstract concept or idea, it's in class III (hóq).
- Examples: noı, daq, dao, sıo, muı, zu…
- Other verbs are 'class 4 (tá).
- Examples: doq, nuı, juı, lıo, muo, raq, daı, de…
(TODO: what is the animacy class of verbs that imply action or thought of the subject? I think they're class I also, but I'm not sure. koı, moı, tao, fıeq, jaı…?)