Prefix Reform: Difference between revisions

m various tiny changes
rewording regarding äımu and ạimu
Line 56: Line 56:
|}
|}


The value of this proposal, apart from more flexibility and less ambiguity, is that stems no longer alternate between stressed and unstressed depending on whether they have prefixes attached to them (think {{t|<u>juı</u>taq}} vs. {{t|bụ<u>juı</u>}}). As another pleasant side effect, poly[[raku]]ic words in {{done|3}} are now possible (like {{t|äımu}}; officially not distinguishable from {{t|ạımu}}).
The value of this proposal, apart from more flexibility and less ambiguity, is that stems no longer alternate between stressed and unstressed depending on whether they have prefixes attached to them (think {{t|<u>juı</u>taq}} vs. {{t|bụ<u>juı</u>}}). As another pleasant side effect, poly[[raku]]ic words in {{done|3}} are now possible (like {{t|äımu}}, which before was ambiguous with the mid-falling allotone of {{t|ạımu}}).


==See also==
==See also==


* [https://discord.com/channels/311223912044167168/889589074011230230/1113157808934883469 uakci’s original message]
* [https://discord.com/channels/311223912044167168/889589074011230230/1113157808934883469 uakci’s original message]