Prefix Reform

Prefix Reform is a proposal by uakci to change how prefixes interact with the stems of words.

Note: the two parts of the proposal, Spelling changes and Pronunciation changes, could be considered independently of each other.

Reasons

1. Prefixes currently act weird.
   1. They are unable to interact with . This proposal would allow prefixes to go on words with .
   2. It is unclear how exactly they affect vocalic length. Plus, those interactions are often quite subtle and easily missed – consider bộtao vs. bô'otao. This makes prefixes hard to teach and possibly discouraging to a new learner trying to produce them in speech.
2. The current spelling of prefixes is not computer-friendly. They are difficult (if not impossible) to type for many and some characters, like ı̣ often do not display correctly in many fonts. This proposal would allow for easier input and guarantee compatibility with most good fonts.
   • There's a gotcha where e- (any prefix) + ano (any vowel-initial stem) is not ẹano /eʔeano/ but ẹ'ano /eʔeʔano/. This subtletly is not explained or taught to people, and it's likewise unintuitive.

Spelling changes

Instead of putting the tone mark on the first syllable, put it on the first syllable of the stem. In the case of a word with , use as the diacritic.

Examples

Official	Proposal
mụfoaq	mufòaq
lạ́maı	lamáı
bọ̈na (invalid word)	bonä
bộtao	botâo

Pronunciation changes

Stress the first syllable of the stem rather than the prefix, separating the stem from the prefixes. Stressed syllables should be louder and/or longer and/or more extreme in terms of the tone contour. Prefixes should be pronounced unstressed, with its tone “anticipating” the stem’s contour. For example, if the stem starts high, the prefixes should be high. If the stem starts lower, the prefixes should be there as well. Unstressed syllables should strive to be quiet, short(ened), and minimal in terms of tone contour or just pronounced as level tone.

Illustrative examples:

Examples

Official	Proposal
puchụmtao /ˈpuː˥˨t͡ɕuˀum˨˩tʰao˩/	puchumtào /pu˥t͡ɕum˥˦ˈtao˦˩/
jı̣achıa /ˈd͡ʑiˀia˥˨t͡ɕia˨˩/	jıachìa /d͡ʑia˥˦ˈt͡ɕiːa˦˩/
lạ́maı bẹ́ıroı /ˈlaˀa˨˦mai˦˥ ˈbeˀei˨˩roi˩/	lamáı beıróı /la˧ˈmai˧˥ bei˧˨ˈroi˨˩/
N/A	bonä /bo˧˨ˈnaˀa˨˩/
jụ̂aqjuaı /ˈd͡ʑuˀuaŋ˧˥˨d͡ʑu˨˩ai˩/	juaqjûaı /d͡ʑuaŋ˧˦ˈd͡ʑu˦˥˨ai˨˩/

The value of this proposal, apart from more flexibility and less ambiguity, is that stems no longer alternate between stressed and unstressed depending on whether they have prefixes attached to them (think juıtaq vs. bụjuı). As another pleasant side effect, polyrakuic words in are now possible (like äımu, which before was ambiguous with the mid-falling allotonal forms of ạımu and ạ́ımu).

See also

• uakci’s original message