685
edits
m (Lynn moved page Auto-terminating clauses to Self-termination) |
(Delta) |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Toaq has '''self-terminating''' clauses. A subclause is "terminated" when it can't take any more arguments, and yet another positional argument follows. The "self-" reflects the fact that no explicit terminating particle is necessary. | |||
{{Example|Meoca {{blue|ꝡä loı súq nháo}} jí.|{{blue|The fact that you hate her}} saddens me.}} | |||
It would be ungrammatical for {{t|jí}} to be a third argument to {{t|loı}}, which is "full" — so it must be a second argument to {{t|meoca}}. | |||
{{Example|Bua ké poq {{blue|ꝡë luı do hóa jí ní}} ní doaq.|The person {{blue|who gave me this}} lives in this city.}} | |||
{{ | It would be ungrammatical for {{t|ní doaq}} to be a fourth argument to {{t|do}}, so the ꝡë-clause closes before it. | ||
These examples are intentionally written without commas to clarify that the comma isn't what closes a subclause. But in practice, it's considered proper Toaq punctuation style to write a comma at the start and end of a subclause: {{t|Bua ké poq, {{blue|ꝡë luı do hóa jí ní}}, ní doaq.}} | |||
== | == A limitation == | ||
One | One limitation is that self-termination isn't activated by adverbials, so it's hard to add an adverbial to the end of a main clause with a subclause object. | ||
{{Example| | {{Example|Ruaq súq, {{blue|ꝡä jaı súq râo púchaq}}.|You say {{blue|that you were "happy yesterday"}}.}} | ||
{{Example|Ruaq súq, {{blue|ꝡä jaı súq {{red|???}}}} râo púchaq.|You said {{blue|that you are "happy"}}, yesterday.}} | |||
Without {{t|cy}} at our disposal, we have no choice but to move the adverbial elsewhere ({{t|Ruaq râo púchaq súq, ꝡä…}}). |