216
edits
(The basics) |
m ('sema' is plural) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
[[File:Sema.png|alt=A circle inside a pair of square brackets, with a squiggly line underneath|thumb|160x160px|[[Kuna|Kuna's]] symbol for a sema]] | [[File:Sema.png|alt=A circle inside a pair of square brackets, with a squiggly line underneath|thumb|160x160px|[[Kuna|Kuna's]] symbol for a sema]] | ||
In Toaq semantics, the '''Sema Hypothesis''' refers to the idea that pronouns denote ''intensional pluralities of entities'', also known as | In Toaq semantics, the '''Sema Hypothesis''' refers to the idea that pronouns denote ''intensional pluralities of entities'', also known as {{Dr|sema}}. That is, an expression like {{Dr|hó}} may refer to more than one entity as in [[plural logic]], and moreover the referents may be different in different [[Modal|possible worlds]]. | ||
For example, imagine that {{Dr|hó}} refers to the members of Mary's band. These may be just [Mary, John] in the real world, while in the possible world where Charles and Sue had joined the band instead of John, these may be [Mary, Charles, Sue]. In other words, not only can the exact referents vary, but even the ''number of referents'' can vary. | For example, imagine that {{Dr|hó}} refers to the members of Mary's band. These may be just [Mary, John] in the real world, while in the possible world where Charles and Sue had joined the band instead of John, these may be [Mary, Charles, Sue]. In other words, not only can the exact referents vary, but even the ''number of referents'' can vary. | ||
The sema is taken to be the common "type interface" used throughout Toaq's system of binding and anaphoric reference, and therefore is a cornerstone of the theory of semantics used in [[Kuna]]. | The sema is taken to be the common "type interface" used throughout Toaq's system of binding and anaphoric reference, and therefore is a cornerstone of the theory of semantics used in [[Kuna]]. | ||