Focus, topic, cleft

Revision as of 20:42, 6 December 2023 by Uakci (talk | contribs) (noun phrase → noun form)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

, , and are three particles whose purpose is easily confused. Let’s examine the ways in which they differ.

Main use

Báq shamu , mí Laqme soqcho hóa báq soe.
As for apples, Laqme, she likes sour ones best.

In this sentence…

  • is a topic marker. It identifies what the sentence is about. Here, it tells the listener that we're making some point about apples.
  • is a cleft verb. It purely helps us rearrange words when we feel like it. Here, it achieves a pseudo SVO word order.
  • is a focus marker. It identifies the new or contrasting information in the sentence: What apples does Laqme like? Sour apples.

Syntax

  • The syntax of is: topıccomment.
    • topic must be a definite noun form, like the cat or that I love you. If you want to refer back to the topic, you may not use hóa, but you may use any of the other strategies available to you, like máq or hụ́ꝡa.
  • The word can be used to front noun forms and adverbials.
    • When fronting a noun form, the syntax is noun formrelatıve clause. The relative clause must refer back to the noun form, either using hóa or an appropriate pronoun like .
    • When fronting an adverbial, the syntax is adverbıalclause. In this usage, hóa is not used because there’s nothing to refer back to.
  • The word goes in front of the focused piece of information. To focus a single word instead of a whole constituent, you can use the prefix form ku-. See Simple Focus.

Gotchas

  • Focus is often rendered as an English cleft in translation: Shao paı jí kú súq It’s you who I want to be friends with. However, Toaq clefts do not impart focus: Súq nä shao paı jí hóa is just another way of saying Shao paı jí súq. You may, however, use the two features in tandem: Kú súq nä shao paı jí hóa.
  • For noun forms, does not bind hóa. You must use another anaphoric pronoun if you want to refer back to the topic. The crucial difference is that ’s complement, the topic established, is not required to appear in the clause! So for example, this is valid Toaq (and valid English, although some languages like Japanese like this pattern better than English does) and the extra specification in square brackets is not required at all:
    Báq kası bï, he duq garabıa jí [gêm máq].
    As for walnuts, I tend to get nausea [from them].