Full Arguments: Difference between revisions

Full Arguments (view source)

560 bytes removed , 17:41, 1 October 2022

538

edits

@@ Line 11: / Line 11: @@
 The difficulty with this proposal is that there are a few verbs which make sense both as adverbs and prepositions, for example {{t|ào}} and {{t|ão}}.
-== Auto-terminating clauses ==
+== See also ==
-A similar idea sometimes rolled into the name Full Arguments is that of '''auto-terminating clauses'''.
+* [[Auto-terminating clauses]]
-The idea is that you don't need to say {{t|cy}} when a subclause verb has all its arguments filled.
-You know that the next argument must belong to the outer clause, because the inner clause can't take any more arguments.
-{{Example|Mẻoca {{blue|lôı súq nháo}} jí.|{{blue|The fact that you hate them}} saddens me.}}
-It would be ungrammatical for {{t|jí}} to be a third argument to {{t|loı}}, which is "full" — so it must be a second argument to {{t|meoca}}.