704
edits
Open questions about official Toaq: Difference between revisions
Open questions about official Toaq (view source)
Revision as of 13:51, 17 May 2022
, 13:51, 17 May 2022áq chéq
No edit summary |
(áq chéq) |
||
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
** I am wont to say that Toaq anaphoras should only be allowed to go “back” – that is, that they must not be epiphoras. We could imagine {{t|kuq còu nháo áq}} as an interesting usage where it’s the {{t|còu}} phrase that takes subject/head position. [[user:uakci|uakci]]<sup>[[user talk:uakci|talk]]</sup> | ** I am wont to say that Toaq anaphoras should only be allowed to go “back” – that is, that they must not be epiphoras. We could imagine {{t|kuq còu nháo áq}} as an interesting usage where it’s the {{t|còu}} phrase that takes subject/head position. [[user:uakci|uakci]]<sup>[[user talk:uakci|talk]]</sup> | ||
* Does a genitival serial construction narrow down the x₂ of the head verb or fill it, removing it in the process? That is to say, does {{t|chuq rỏehuı}} expand to ‘{{x}} eats junk food {{x}}’ or just ‘{{x}} eats junk food’? [[user:uakci|uakci]] 21:50, 13 May 2022 (UTC) | * Does a genitival serial construction narrow down the x₂ of the head verb or fill it, removing it in the process? That is to say, does {{t|chuq rỏehuı}} expand to ‘{{x}} eats junk food {{x}}’ or just ‘{{x}} eats junk food’? [[user:uakci|uakci]] 21:50, 13 May 2022 (UTC) | ||
* Do the reflexive anaphoric words {{t|áq}}, {{t|chéq}} refer to the subject of the current (sub)clause or do they always go back to the matrix clause? This is quite an important underspecification given that {{t|áq}} ''must'' be used in place of other anaphoric predicates whenever possible. [[user:uakci|uakci]] 13:51, 17 May 2022 (UTC) | |||
===Resolved questions=== | ===Resolved questions=== | ||