Prefix Reform: Difference between revisions

19 bytes added ,  17:17, 16 November 2023
use a more probably example for t3
(update and correct phonetic analyses)
(use a more probably example for t3)
Line 24: Line 24:
|{{t|lamáı}}
|{{t|lamáı}}
|-
|-
|{{t|bọ̈na}} <small>{{red|''(invalid word)''}}</small>
|{{t|tọ̈ꝡa}} <small>{{red|''(invalid word)''}}</small>
|{{t|bonä}}
|{{t|toꝡä}}
|-
|-
|{{t|bộtao}}
|{{t|bộtao}}
Line 48: Line 48:
|-
|-
|{{t|lạ́maı bẹ́ıroı}} [ˈlăʔă˨˦maj˦˥ ˈbɛ̆ʔɛ̆j˨˩rɔj˩]
|{{t|lạ́maı bẹ́ıroı}} [ˈlăʔă˨˦maj˦˥ ˈbɛ̆ʔɛ̆j˨˩rɔj˩]
|{{t|lamáı beıróı}} [la˧ˈmaj˧˥ bei˧˨ˈrɔj˨˩]
|{{t|lamáı beıróı}} [la˧ˈmaj˧˥ bɛj˧˨ˈrɔj˨˩]
|-
|-
| style="background:#ccc" |N/A
| style="background:#ccc" |N/A
|{{t|bonä}} [bo˧˨ˈnaʔa˨˩]
|{{t|toꝡä}} [tʰo˧˨ˈjaʔa˨˩]
|-
|-
|{{t|jụ̂aqjuaı}} [ˈd͡ʑŭʔŭaŋ˧˥˨d͡ʑu˨˩aj˩]
|{{t|jụ̂aqjuaı}} [ˈd͡ʑŭʔŭaŋ˧˥˨d͡ʑu˨˩aj˩]
Line 57: Line 57:
|}
|}


The value of this proposal, apart from more flexibility and less ambiguity, is that stems no longer alternate between stressed and unstressed depending on whether they have prefixes attached to them (think {{t|<u>juı</u>taq}} vs. {{t|bụ<u>juı</u>}}). As another pleasant side effect, poly[[raku]]ic words in {{done|3}} are now possible (like {{t|äımu}}, which before was ambiguous with the mid-falling allotonal forms of {{t|ạımu}} and {{t|ạ́ımu}}).
The value of this proposal, apart from more flexibility and less ambiguity, is that stems no longer alternate between stressed and unstressed depending on whether they have prefixes attached to them (think {{t|<u>juı</u>taq}} vs. {{t|bụ<u>juı</u>}}). As another pleasant side effect, poly[[raku]]<nowiki />ic words in {{done|3}} are now possible (like {{t|äımu}}, which before was ambiguous with the mid-falling allotonal forms of {{t|ạımu}} and {{t|ạ́ımu}}).


==See also==
==See also==


* [https://discord.com/channels/311223912044167168/889589074011230230/1113157808934883469 uakci’s original message]
* [https://discord.com/channels/311223912044167168/889589074011230230/1113157808934883469 uakci’s original message]