Self-termination: Difference between revisions

1,153 bytes added ,  17:32, 21 March 2023
explain a bit more
(Created page with "It has been proposed that Toaq could have '''auto-terminating clauses'''. The idea is that you don't need to say {{t|cy}} when a subclause verb has all its arguments filled. You know that the next argument must belong to the outer clause, because the inner clause can't take any more arguments. {{Example|Mẻoca {{blue|lôı súq nháo}} jí.|{{blue|The fact that you hate them}} saddens me.}} It would be ungrammatical for {{t|jí}} to be a third argument to {{t|loı}}...")
 
(explain a bit more)
 
(4 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
It has been proposed that Toaq could have '''auto-terminating clauses'''.
Toaq has '''self-terminating''' clauses. A subclause is "terminated" when it can't take any more arguments, and yet another positional argument follows. The "self-" reflects the fact that no explicit terminating particle is necessary.


The idea is that you don't need to say {{t|cy}} when a subclause verb has all its arguments filled.
{{Example|Meoca {{blue|ꝡä loı súq nháo}} jí.|{{blue|The fact that you hate her}} saddens me.}}


You know that the next argument must belong to the outer clause, because the inner clause can't take any more arguments.
It would be ungrammatical for {{t|jí}} to be a third argument to {{t|loı}}, which is "full" — so it must be a second argument to {{t|meoca}}.
 
{{Example|Bua ké poq {{blue|ꝡë luı do hóa jí ní}} ní doaq.|The person {{blue|who gave me this}} lives in this city.}}
 
It would be ungrammatical for {{t|ní doaq}} to be a fourth argument to {{t|do}}, so the ꝡë-clause closes before it.
 
These examples are intentionally written without commas to clarify that the comma isn't what closes a subclause. But in practice, it's considered proper Toaq punctuation style to write a comma at the start and end of a subclause: {{t|Bua ké poq, {{blue|ꝡë luı do hóa jí ní}}, ní doaq.}}


{{Example|Mẻoca {{blue|lôı súq nháo}} jí.|{{blue|The fact that you hate them}} saddens me.}}
== A limitation ==
One limitation is that self-termination isn't activated by adverbials, so it's hard to add an adverbial to the end of a main clause with a subclause object.


It would be ungrammatical for {{t|}} to be a third argument to {{t|loı}}, which is "full" — so it must be a second argument to {{t|meoca}}.
{{Example|Ruaq súq, {{blue|ꝡä jaı súq râo púchaq}}.|You say {{blue|that you were "happy yesterday"}}.}}
{{Example|Ruaq súq, {{blue|ꝡä jaı súq {{red|???}}}} râo púchaq.|You said {{blue|that you are "happy"}}, yesterday.}}
 
Without {{t|cy}} (subclause terminator from previous Toaq versions) at our disposal, we have no choice but to move the adverbial elsewhere.{{Example|Ruaq râo púchaq súq, {{blue|ꝡä jaı súq}}.|You said yesterday {{blue|that you are "happy"}}.}}