Thematic role: Difference between revisions

From The Toaq Wiki
No edit summary
(update content and word forms)
 
(One intermediate revision by one other user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{GammaNote}}
A '''thematic role''' or '''semantic role''' is a way in which an object can relate to an event.
A '''thematic role''' or '''semantic role''' is a way in which an object can relate to an event.


Some examples of thematic roles are:
Some examples of thematic roles are:
* “agent”: who is willfully causing this event?
* “agent”: who is willfully causing this event?
* “instrument”: what is used to carry out this event?
* “benefactor”: who benefits from this event?
* “patient”: who or what is affected/changed by this event?
* “patient”: who or what is affected/changed by this event?


Line 16: Line 14:
<blockquote>{{t|choıdea}}: ___ stabs ___.</blockquote>
<blockquote>{{t|choıdea}}: ___ stabs ___.</blockquote>


Whereas thematic roles are represented using verbs that relate an event to an object, generally used as [[prepositions]] ({{tone|6}}):
Whereas thematic roles are represented using verbs that relate an event to an object, generally used as [[preposition]]s ({{done|4}}):


<blockquote>{{t|chou}}: ___ is an event with ___ as its instrument.</blockquote>
<blockquote>{{t|nhuq}}: ___ happens for ___'s benefit.</blockquote>


=== An example ===
=== An example ===
Line 30: Line 28:
! Subject !! Object !! Agent !! Patient
! Subject !! Object !! Agent !! Patient
|-
|-
| (1) {{t|Chỏıdea Bủtusy Kảısary da.}}<br>Brutus stabs Caesar. || Brutus || Caesar || Brutus || Caesar
| (1) {{t|Choıdea Butusu Kaısa da.}}<br>Brutus stabs Caesar. || Brutus || Caesar || Brutus || Caesar
|-
|-
| (2) {{t|Mủ chỏıdea Kảısary Bủtusy da.}}<br>Caesar is-stabbed-by Brutus. || Caesar || Brutus || Brutus || Caesar
| (2) {{t|Bọchoıdea Kaısa Butusu da.}}<br>Caesar is-stabbed-by Brutus. || Caesar || Brutus || Brutus || Caesar
|}
|}


Note that the assignment of Agent and Patient roles to Brutus and Caesar happens “automatically” according to the semantics of {{t|choıdea}}. To stab is for an agent to stab a patient.
Note that the assignment of Agent and Patient roles to Brutus and Caesar happens “automatically” according to the semantics of {{t|choıdea}}. To stab is for an agent to stab a patient.


We can further dress the event up with an “instrument” using a thematic role word:
We can further dress the event up with a “benefactor” using a preposition:


<blockquote>(3) {{t|Chỏıdea Bủtusy Kảısary <u>chòu</u> sa tỏemy da.}}<br>(4) {{t|Mủ chỏıdea Kảısary Bủtusy <u>chòu</u> sa tỏemy da.}}</blockquote>
<blockquote>(3) {{t|Choıdea Butusu Kaısa <u>nhûq</u> mí Loqgınu da.}}<br>(4) {{t|Bọchoıdea Kaısa Butusu <u>nhûq</u> mí Loqgınu da.}}</blockquote>


We say that the stabbing-event, or the being-stabbed-event, “happens using” a knife.
We say that the stabbing-event, or the being-stabbed-event, “happens for” Longinus's sake.
 
=== In Toaq deep [[syntax]] ===
 
(TODO: mention Spec𝑣P thematic role assignment vs. Spec/CompVP syntactic roles)


== Table of thematic role words ==
== Table of thematic role words ==


Each of these has a definition like: “___ is an event with ___ as its '''(Role)'''.”
Each of these has a definition like: “___ is an event with ___ as its '''(Role)'''.”. The first column lists “transparent” forms, or one that are built from some representative root (like {{t|lıe}} ‘to experience’ for Experiencer, etc.). The second column is a made-up root that has the same meaning, but offers the convenience of being shorter or more elegant than its “transparent” counterpart – note that the word forms with an outgoing link (↗) are unofficial.


{| class="wikitable"
{| class="wikitable"
! Toaq word !! Role !! Example
! colspan=3 | Toaq word
! rowspan=2 | Role
! rowspan=2 | Example
|-
|-
| {{t|chou}}
! style="font-weight: normal; font-style: italic;" colspan=2 | Transparent
| Instrument
! style="font-weight: normal; font-style: italic;" | Opaque
| {{t|chòu sa tỏemy}}, “<u>using</u> a knife”
|-
|-
| {{t|bọtua}}
| {{t|tuacha}}
| {{t|ecı||ecı%20@TheAndSys}}
| Actor
| {{t|bộtua jí}}, “<u>brought about by</u> me”
|-
| {{t|bọtao}}
| {{t|taocha}}
|
| Intentional actor
| {{t|bộtao jí}}, “<u>done by</u> me”
|-
| {{t|bọne}}
| ({{t|necha}})
| {{t|nhe}}
| {{t|nhe}}
| Extent
| Extent
| {{t|lỏq náo nhè néıheı kẻıcıu}}, “the water is <u>90°C</u> hot”
| {{t|loq náo nhê néıheı keıcıu}}, “the water is <u>90°C</u> hot”
|-
|-
! colspan="3" style="text-align:center" | Words below this line are unofficial
|
|
| {{t|zuo}}
| Purpose
| {{t|zûo ꝡä jaı súq}}, “<u>so that</u> you may be happy”
|-
|-
| {{t|sıny / sıy}}
|
| Starting point, source, origin
|
| {{t|jảra nháo sìy búe}}, “they run <u>from</u> the house”
| {{t|fana}}
|-
| {{t|fany / fay}}
| End point, direction, goal
| End point, direction, goal
| {{t|jảra nháo fày búe}}, “they run <u>toward</u> the house”
| {{t|jara nháo fâna búe}}, “they run <u>toward</u> the house”
|-
|-
| {{t|puoq}}
|
| Purpose
|
| {{t|pùoq jâı súq}}, <u>so that</u> you may be happy”
| {{t|duo}}
| Duration
| {{t|jara nháo dûo sá hora}}, “they run <u>for</u> an hour”
|-
|-
| {{t|gekyı}}<ref>{{t|kyı}} is an invalid syllable, marking these words as somewhat more experimental than the others.</ref>
|
| Stimulus
|
| {{t|ảchu gèkyı hóegıo}}, “I sneeze <u>from</u> the sunlight”
| {{t|kuı}}
| Reason
| {{t|soa jí súq kûı ꝡä paı súq jí}}, “I help you <u>because</u> you're my friend”
|-
|-
| {{t|juqkyı}}
|
| Recipient, benefactor
|
| {{t|sủaq jí jùqkyı súq}}, “I sing <u>for</u> you”
| {{t|sını}}
| Starting point, source, origin
| {{t|jara nháo sînı búe}}, “they run <u>from</u> the house”
|-
|-
| {{t|toıkyı}}
|
| Agent
| {{t|gecha}}
| {{t|pỏaq núoqmy tòıkyı jí}}, “the mirror shatters <u>by my doing</u>
| {{t|gem||head:gem%20@uakci}}
| Stimulus
| {{t|achu gêm hóegıo}}, “I sneeze <u>from</u> the sunlight”
|-
|-
| {{t|tekyı}}
|
| {{t|techa}}
|
| Patient
| Patient
| {{t|rủqshua tètyı jí}}, “it rains <u>on (affecting, i.e. wetting)</u> me”
| {{t|ruqshua têcha jí}}, “it rains <u>on (affecting, i.e. wetting)</u> me”
|-
|-
| {{t|taqkyı}}
|
| {{t|taqcha}}
|
| Agent + patient (affecting self)
| Agent + patient (affecting self)
|  
|
|-
|-
| {{t|lıekyı}}
|
| {{t|lıecha}}
|
| Experiencer
| Experiencer
|
|
|-
|
| {{t|juqcha}}
| {{t|com||com%20@lynn}}
| (Intended) recipient
| {{t|shoı jí côm súq}}, “I shout <u>at</u> you” <br> {{t|kuq jí sá côm súq}}, “I say something <u>to</u> you” <br> {{t|juo ní côm súq}} “This is a letter <u>for</u> you”
|}
|}


“Agent” and “patient” roles are usually baked into a transitive verb, so translating {{t|toıkyı}} and {{t|tekyı}} can be a bit tricky or ambiguous.
“Agent” and “patient” roles are usually baked into a transitive verb, so translating {{t|toıcha}} and {{t|techa}} can be a bit tricky or ambiguous.

Latest revision as of 11:22, 7 July 2023

A thematic role or semantic role is a way in which an object can relate to an event.

Some examples of thematic roles are:

  • “agent”: who is willfully causing this event?
  • “benefactor”: who benefits from this event?
  • “patient”: who or what is affected/changed by this event?

Syntactic and thematic roles

Thematic roles exist in contrast to syntactic roles, like “subject” or “direct object”: these describe a way in which something participates in a verb at the syntax level.

In Toaq, syntactic roles are the ones already represented by the “blanks” in verb definitions:

choıdea: ___ stabs ___.

Whereas thematic roles are represented using verbs that relate an event to an object, generally used as prepositions (hiatus tone):

nhuq: ___ happens for ___'s benefit.

An example

In the two sentences below, the syntactic subject and object are exchanged, but the thematic roles stay the same: Brutus, the agent, is causing change, while Caesar, the patient, suffers this change.

Sentence Syntactic roles Thematic roles
Subject Object Agent Patient
(1) Choıdea mí Butusu mí Kaısa da.
Brutus stabs Caesar.
Brutus Caesar Brutus Caesar
(2) Bọchoıdea mí Kaısa mí Butusu da.
Caesar is-stabbed-by Brutus.
Caesar Brutus Brutus Caesar

Note that the assignment of Agent and Patient roles to Brutus and Caesar happens “automatically” according to the semantics of choıdea. To stab is for an agent to stab a patient.

We can further dress the event up with a “benefactor” using a preposition:

(3) Choıdea mí Butusu mí Kaısa nhûq mí Loqgınu da.
(4) Bọchoıdea mí Kaısa mí Butusu nhûq mí Loqgınu da.

We say that the stabbing-event, or the being-stabbed-event, “happens for” Longinus's sake.

In Toaq deep syntax

(TODO: mention Spec𝑣P thematic role assignment vs. Spec/CompVP syntactic roles)

Table of thematic role words

Each of these has a definition like: “___ is an event with ___ as its (Role).”. The first column lists “transparent” forms, or one that are built from some representative root (like lıe ‘to experience’ for Experiencer, etc.). The second column is a made-up root that has the same meaning, but offers the convenience of being shorter or more elegant than its “transparent” counterpart – note that the word forms with an outgoing link (↗) are unofficial.

Toaq word Role Example
Transparent Opaque
bọtua tuacha ecı Actor bộtua jí, “brought about by me”
bọtao taocha Intentional actor bộtao jí, “done by me”
bọne (necha) nhe Extent loq náo nhê néıheı keıcıu, “the water is 90°C hot”
zuo Purpose zûo ꝡä jaı súq, “so that you may be happy”
fana End point, direction, goal jara nháo fâna búe, “they run toward the house”
duo Duration jara nháo dûo sá hora, “they run for an hour”
kuı Reason soa jí súq kûı ꝡä paı súq jí, “I help you because you're my friend”
sını Starting point, source, origin jara nháo sînı búe, “they run from the house”
gecha gem Stimulus achu jí gêm hóegıo, “I sneeze from the sunlight”
techa Patient ruqshua têcha jí, “it rains on (affecting, i.e. wetting) me”
taqcha Agent + patient (affecting self)
lıecha Experiencer
juqcha com (Intended) recipient shoı jí côm súq, “I shout at you”
kuq jí sá côm súq, “I say something to you”
juo ní côm súq “This is a letter for you”

“Agent” and “patient” roles are usually baked into a transitive verb, so translating toıcha and techa can be a bit tricky or ambiguous.