Jump to content

Auto-hóa: Difference between revisions

243 bytes added ,  11:53, 23 September 2021
no edit summary
m (Hoaqgio moved page Relative pronoun ellipsis to Resumptive pronoun elipsis: "relative pronoun" means something else)
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
'''Relative pronoun ellipsis'''<ref group=note>I vacillated between different formulations of the title of this article, but in the end decided that this is the most ‘correct’ version (while also being vaguely friendly). ~uakci</ref>, also known as '''{{t|hóa}} elision''' or just '''auto-{{t|hóa}}''', is the “study” of interpreting omission of the relative pronoun {{t|hóa}} in a {{tone|3}} relative clause phrase.
'''Resumptive pronoun ellipsis'''<ref group=note>I vacillated between different formulations of the title of this article, but in the end decided that this is the most ‘correct’ version (while also being vaguely friendly). ~uakci</ref>, also known as '''auto-{{t|hóa}}''' (or '''{{t|hóa}}-elision''') relates to the appearance of relative clauses which do not use {{t|hóa}} or any other pronoun to refer to their heads, such  as the relative clause in {{t|sa pỏq nïe kúa}}. A resumptive pronoun ellipsis rule is a rule which assigns meanings to these otherwise meaningless clauses, usually by specifying a spot where a covert {{t|hóa}} appears automatically.


== Scary English words ==
== Scary English words ==
55

edits