Jump to content

User:The&System/Minatoaq: Difference between revisions

Still unfinished but I worked on it
(Unfinished. Publishing to pressure myself to finish this after school.)
 
(Still unfinished but I worked on it)
 
Line 1: Line 1:
This set of ideas for a possible Toaq Epsilon is a mixture of Loekia's ideas for what a Toaq Epsilon might look like
This set of ideas for a possible Toaq Epsilon is a mixture of Loekia's ideas for what a Toaq Epsilon might look like. I like to see it more as a collection of good ideas than as a proposal per se.


== Ideals ==
== Ideals ==
Line 9: Line 9:
Minatoaq has the same tones as Toaq Delta.
Minatoaq has the same tones as Toaq Delta.


== Serialization Rules ==
== Borrows from Eatoaq ==
Minatoaq has the same serialization rules as Eatoaq. All slots of every word must be filled.
Minatoaq directly borrows the following parts of Eatoaq:


== Fronted Adjuncts ==
- Underfilling: Underfilling is disallowed. Nouns must be object-incorporated.
TODO
- Serials: Words that form serials with their subject must form serials when used as nouns.
- Objects: The verbal complex incorporates objects with the hiatus tone, nouns incorporate them with the falling tone.
- Adjuncts: Fronted adjuncts are written in the falling tone and with object incorporation.
 
Adjectives are always treated as subject sharing. If one wants to use them as adverbials, a relative clause is best used.
 
sá suaq de
A singer who is beautiful.
 
sá ꝡë suaq dê hóa
Someone who sings beautifully.
 
== Closing Clauses ==
Minatoaq borrows the clause closer na from Koamtoaq. The issues with this behavior will be explained below, but it is a suitable solution for the several problems with clause boundaries.
 
TODO: continue this once i've thought more about
- adjuncts
- names
- ajectives
- connectives
16

edits