Jump to content

Old words: Difference between revisions

185 bytes added ,  00:10, 24 August 2022
no edit summary
(Created page with "The words on this page were official or in very common use, but have since fallen into disuse. == Linking words == The words {{t|fi}}, {{t|go}}, {{t|cu}}, and {{t|ke/ta}} used to mark the slot (1st, 2nd, 3rd, 4th) that the following noun phrase fills. toaq.org writes: <blockquote>Without marking, an argument phrase always goes in the lowest numbered unfilled place. Using linking words, that order can be manipulated: {{t|Bỏdoa jí cu hó ní tỉai.}}</blockquote>...")
 
No edit summary
Line 28: Line 28:
* {{t|iq}} (and maybe {{t|oq}}) were almost-officially-proposed markers of "high" [[adverbials]].
* {{t|iq}} (and maybe {{t|oq}}) were almost-officially-proposed markers of "high" [[adverbials]].
* {{t|jeo}} used to be “___ is true; ___ satisfies property ___” — it is now split into {{t|jeo}} and {{t|iq}}.
* {{t|jeo}} used to be “___ is true; ___ satisfies property ___” — it is now split into {{t|jeo}} and {{t|iq}}.
* {{t|go}}, after being a 2nd-slot marker, used to be a question tag illocution, used for agreement seaking, as in “blahblahblah, ’’right’’?”. (now {{t|nhó}} or {{t|zí}})