43
edits
(update for delta) |
|||
Line 28: | Line 28: | ||
</blockquote> | </blockquote> | ||
Toaq has grammar to describe a property: you use a | Toaq has grammar to describe a property: you use a [[content clause]] that begins with {{t|lä}} and has the word {{t|já}} in it. | ||
This word, {{t| | This word, {{t|já}}, corresponds to the hole in the property. | ||
For example: | For example: | ||
{{Example| | {{Example|lä geanua {{green|já}} tóqfua|{{green|▯}} lifts up the table.}} | ||
{{Example| | {{Example|Leo jí lä geanua já tóqfua.|I try to satisfy "▯ lifts up the table."}} | ||
In English, we just say "I try {{green|to lift up the table}}." There's no word that corresponds to {{t| | In English, we just say "I try {{green|to lift up the table}}." There's no word that corresponds to {{t|já}}. Properties in Toaq often correspond to English infinitives and gerunds. | ||
=== Example: comparatives === | === Example: comparatives === | ||
Line 47: | Line 47: | ||
This word says that one thing satisfies some property to a greater degree/extent than another. | This word says that one thing satisfies some property to a greater degree/extent than another. | ||
{{Example| | {{Example|lä sheaqsao {{green|já}}|{{green|▯}} is tall.}} | ||
{{Example| | {{Example|Huaq jí súq lä sheaqsao já.|I am more than you in "▯ is tall."<br>I am taller than you.}} | ||
This example somewhat demonstrates the usefulness of properties. We can say {{t| | This example somewhat demonstrates the usefulness of properties. We can say {{t|lä sheaqsao já}} to refer to "tallness" or "being tall" in the abstract, and then use {{t|huaq}} to compare two concrete "fillings" of that property. | ||
If we only had complete clauses, we'd have to repeat ourselves and say something like "{{t| | If we only had complete clauses, we'd have to repeat ourselves and say something like "{{t|ꝡä sheaqsao jí}} is more true than {{t|ꝡä sheaqsao súq}}". | ||
== {{t| | == {{t|já}} is a determiner == | ||
The "property hole marker" {{t| | The "property hole marker" {{t|já}} is a [[determiner]], just like {{t|sá}} or {{t|tú}}. This means it can be followed by a verb in {{Done|1}} to give a name and domain to the hole it creates. | ||
<blockquote> | <blockquote> | ||
{{t| | {{t|lä mıu {{green|já deo}} ꝡä moıjoe déo}} = {{green|▯ ({{t|déo}}), a child,}} opines that {{t|déo}} is smart.<br>= "for children to find themselves smart." | ||
</blockquote> | </blockquote> | ||
<!-- | |||
== Nested clause gotcha == | == Nested clause gotcha == | ||
One may approach expressing a property like ''I don't know whether ▯ likes conlangs'' like this: | One may approach expressing a property like ''I don't know whether ▯ likes conlangs'' like this: | ||
<blockquote> | <blockquote> | ||
<nowiki>*</nowiki>{{t| | <nowiki>*</nowiki>{{t|lä bu dua jí {{red|mä cho já báq fıeqzu}}}} | ||
</blockquote> | </blockquote> | ||
Sadly this is incorrect! The {{t| | Sadly this is incorrect! The {{t|já}} associates with the nested clause marked in red instead. In situations like these, one is forced to instead say | ||
<blockquote> | <blockquote> | ||
Line 75: | Line 76: | ||
</blockquote> | </blockquote> | ||
Note that this approach is ''never wrong'' – it’s never incorrect to move a {{t| | Note that this approach is ''never wrong'' – it’s never incorrect to move a {{t|já}} into a topic phrase, and doing so reduces cognitive load on both speaker and listener. | ||
--> | |||
== Serial verbs == | == Serial verbs == | ||
Line 87: | Line 90: | ||
</blockquote> | </blockquote> | ||
This works so well that you don't see Toaq speakers say {{t| | This works so well that you don't see Toaq speakers say {{t|já}} anywhere near as often as they use verbs like {{t|leo}} and {{t|huaq}}. Once you're used to the rules of serial verbs, they're easier and shorter. But now you know how it works under the hood! | ||
See the article on [[serial verb]]s for more info. | See the article on [[serial verb]]s for more info. |