Subclause Reform: Difference between revisions

Subclause Reform (view source)

1 byte removed , 3 February

m

punctuation

160

edits

Revision as of 16:53, 3 February 2024 (view source) Loekıa (talk \| contribs) (Introduce sú to address all known remaining issues with the proposal) Tag: Visual edit ← Older edit		Revision as of 16:58, 3 February 2024 (view source) Loekıa (talk \| contribs) m (punctuation) Tag: Visual edit Newer edit →
Line 1:		Line 1:
	The '''Subclause Reform''' is a proposal that changes the grammar of subclauses to fix some ambiguities, and make them more naturalistic. It is inspired by the [[Mö\|mö proposal]] and builds on insights from the article [https://www.sfu.ca/~kmoulton/Moulton_CPs.pdf CPs: Copies and Compositionality].<ref>See also [https://people.umass.edu/scable/LING753-SP20/Handouts/6.Moulton-2015.pdf Arguments Against CPs as Arguments], which presents the article in a more compelling lecture format and provides additional discussion.</ref>		The '''Subclause Reform''' is a proposal that changes the grammar of subclauses to fix some ambiguities and make them more naturalistic. It is inspired by the [[Mö\|mö proposal]] and builds on insights from the article [https://www.sfu.ca/~kmoulton/Moulton_CPs.pdf CPs: Copies and Compositionality].<ref>See also [https://people.umass.edu/scable/LING753-SP20/Handouts/6.Moulton-2015.pdf Arguments Against CPs as Arguments], which presents the article in a more compelling lecture format and provides additional discussion.</ref>

	== Motivation ==		== Motivation ==