11
edits
Research: Difference between revisions
Add the inquisitive semantics textbook, plus another book by the same author that seems relevant
(add some more) |
The&System (talk | contribs) (Add the inquisitive semantics textbook, plus another book by the same author that seems relevant) |
||
| Line 33: | Line 33: | ||
|- | |- | ||
| Coppock & Champollion || ongoing || [https://eecoppock.info/bootcamp/semantics-boot-camp.pdf Invitation to Formal Semantics] || Friendly, huge textbook that covers a ''lot'' of topics. || ✅ | | Coppock & Champollion || ongoing || [https://eecoppock.info/bootcamp/semantics-boot-camp.pdf Invitation to Formal Semantics] || Friendly, huge textbook that covers a ''lot'' of topics. || ✅ | ||
|- | |||
| Cirdelli et al || 2018 || [https://academic.oup.com/book/35968 Inquisitive Semantics] || Introduces a way to model questions and assertions using a unified model. It also requires (at least up to a certain point) only a basic understanding of how propositions are usually modeled in semantics. || ✅ish | |||
|- | |||
| Cirdelli || 2022 || [https://link.springer.com/book/10.1007/978-3-031-09706-5 Inquisitive Logic] || No one has read this one, but the people thinking about adding inqsem to Toaq would probably care about reading it, so I've added it to the list || Unknown | |||
|} | |} | ||